features

It would be great to be able to upload images to replace the calibration dots (even if they were forced to be a certain size/resolution). Furthermore, it would be useful to be bale to upload sound clips that synchronise with the dots/images appearing. This would make for much better attention-grabbing in infants. Even small changes like allowing for multicolours, changing the calibration dot sizes etc. would be very useful.

I am requesting a feature involving "Keyboard Response." While the current Keybaord response allows for a Tag to initiate upon pressing the a key, there is no tag or response created when a key is released. Ideally there may be a time component as well, which would require participants to press and a key for a length of time before prior to initiating a Tag. For instance, if a participant to hold down the "z" key for 90 seconds. Holding for 90 seconds should create a response tag (Or something of the matter). Releasing the key at any point before the 90-second timer should not create a response tag ( e.g., if "z" is pressed, held, and then released at 25 seconds, no response tag.) This may be helpful for creating attention checks that require a participant to be presnet (and pressing) for a certain time period.

Allow participants to download a copy of the consent form or debrief (not all participants are capable of taking screenshots - current workaround is to email them consent form, taken in PDF from Gorilla - but if we can't collect emails, then we can't do this for those participants). This may be useful for all of questionnaire builder (ie to let participants download a copy of their response, including a PDF) but the specific use case is for consent forms/participant information sheets and debrief forms. Alternative would be to have a box to have Gorilla email it to participants rather than download, potentially.

It would be useful if it was possible to download just one csv file for all versions of a task (that are set up as separate nodes in experiment builder). At the moment it can be a bit cumbersome to identify which of many csv files are for different versions of the same task and them processing them into a single dataset.

Greetings! I regularly conduct research using the Implicit Association Test (and its variants). On combined blocks of the IAT, participants respond on some trials to attribute stimuli (usually words) and on other trials they respond to target stimuli (often in the form of pictures). Best practices in using the IAT suggest that on these combined blocks, the attribute stimuli and the target stimuli should alternate between trials, such that on trial 1 an attribute stimulus is presented, on trial 2 a target stimulus is presented, on trial 3 an attribute stimulus is presented, etc. Within each block, the order of the attribute stimuli and target stimuli should also be randomized. In speaking with the Gorilla support folks, it seems that Gorilla is currently unable to support this type of randomization, which is a serious barrier for folks who might want to use Gorilla to implement their own IATs. I would love to see this functionality implemented in a future version of Gorilla. In case it's useful, here's a citation for a guide on best practices in using and constructing the IAT. Thank you for considering this addition! Greenwald AG, Brendl M, Cai H, Cvencek D, Dovidio JF, Friese M, Hahn A, Hehman E, Hofmann W, Hughes S, Hussey I, Jordan C, Kirby TA, Lai CK, Lang JWB, Lindgren KP, Maison D, Ostafin BD, Rae JR, Ratliff KA, Spruyt A, Wiers RW. Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test. Behav Res Methods. 2022

The allocator node with its specific settings is resetted for each new version of an experiment. This hinders a smooth process of allocating participants to e.g. different tasks. It would be nice to have the option to indicate whether one wants to reset the node or not after creating a new version.

Randomising trials based on certain rules, e.g. in a choice reaction time task, the stimulus won't appear more than twice in a row in the same box.

Current counting down dots are not interesting enough for children and babies. For future developmental research, it would be great if can change dots into other images.

Being able to save all the pages of a questionnaire or each task screen would make it easier to share in ethics applications etc.

In Questionnaire Builder 2, when the owner has the questionnaire open for editing, collaborators are shown the last committed version and told that 'This is the latest version'. This is misleading and can cause confusion when discussing the latest version of a questionnaire that is under development. The scenario I have in mind is where the owner is a student (who needs to be the owner because they will be recruiting participants) and the collaborator is somebody who is helping the student with development.